You are here: Home > Message Boards > Relationships >  Womens Issues >Here´ s to " Happy Marriage&quo

Relationships  Discussion Forum

 
Womens Issues:Here´ s to " Happy Marriage" !
2007-04-03
Name: Sivakamia



Sometime I wonder if it is because the story-line of Indian movies by-and-large end where they do- the warm, fuzzy feeling alongside the little to total lack of preparation for such an amazing and enormous adventure, leave many of us believing some or many of the following:

- You are either happy or sad in your married life
- You get lucky with a very understanding and cohesive partner or not
- The joy in marriage is very illusionary especially after children
- Marriage is a social/community event culturally- I don´ t have to be very happy just ensure I fulfill basic responsibilities- as a parent, spouse, nothing much- JUST BASIC

DO you see what I´ m trying to say? We have such all or nothing/Black-White assumptions about marriage. As a family/couples counselor, I never cease to amaze at the marriages that work- and I have seen no \" Happy Marriages\" . The ones I´ m talking about are couples who are committed (many times, one partner more than the other)- they endure and work hard on the not-so-happy days. Not sit and hope for the \" happy days\" of yore, or of course, the ones from an unoriginal movie.

In short, don´ t ask yourself- have I landed the \" right relationship\" ? Instead ask yourself:

- Are there ways I have forgotten to entertain hope for the relationship?
- Are there ways I should be looking at working actively- try something else that I haven´ t already?
- Are my expectations too high or too low?
- Are my partner´ s expectations too different from mine?
- Do i think it´ s a virtue to live with tension or difficulties?
_ Most importantly, do I/my partner focus on only the negatives and let the positives slip by unnoticed?
- Do we value our mental health enough to monitor it and act on improve the quality of life?

Today is a world of instant dosas. We know more about relationships, how they work, what we can do to effectively improve them and so on. And trust me, what you can do through awareness and commitment can effect a change that tastes far far better than those instant dosas!

Bangalore Psychotherapist
Subscribe to this conversation Reply Anonymously

 

2007-05-14
#1
Anonymous Name: anita
Subject:  self esteem



hello sivakamia,
i found ur posts sensitive and hate dissolving.. my question to you is, how does the woman build her self esteem? i am grappling with the realisation that we as women are programme do nurture and love... and i' m very very content when i do that for my husband, but it does not get reciprocated.. not the way i want! and no matter how many times i talk about it with him, it always slips back.. i hate having to always ask for love! we women are so tuned into men and their needs... why not vice versa? and this from a guy whom i think is very broad minded in his outlook! i am made to feel like its just too much to spend time with me, talk with me, be physically intimet with me... i cant tell my husbacnd these things, i' ve tried! but he is not receptive...i' ve suggested we go to a counsellor, read soem books on relations... but he refuses... what is the point of being together if we' re going to have separate lives? talking to me is beyond events in teh world, relatives, opinions, solutions to world problems, ideas... its also about us... and i know we cant have such conversations everyday, but when he senses it in me, he just pretends that it doesn' t exist and i hate that! my self esteem is hit coz i feel unwanted, unneeded.. what do i do?
Reply to Original MessageReply to Original Message   Reply to Original Message Reply to This Message   Msg Objection   Go to Top
 

2007-04-05
#2
Anonymous Name: vimpi
Subject:  Sivakamia and Sudha



Hi both of you,

Thank you for your persepectives from psychological and practical point sof view.
After having studied both points of view closely I have this to say:
MILS are MILS all over the world. The basic behavior which is caused by possessiveness of the son is universal and this can never be expected to change because that is the very nature of a MIL (I am not talking of extreme cases like abuse). It is a fact that most people whatever be their nationality find it stressful keeping up a relationship with a MIL and it is certainly helpful if a MIL keep a distance from the sons marital affairs. Unfortunately in India parents take it for granted that a sons home is theirs and a DIL just happens to be living there. Today a DIL contributes as much as a son to make that home financially or otherwise yet there is no change in the attitude of the inlaws towards her.
How can this be right? Therfore this tradition has got to go. Which means our generation must say we will not live with our sons rather look for ways to make ourselves secure in old age.
As for old age homes, a retirement community is a little different from an old age home. In the sense that it is a gated community of houses for the aged where each one lives independantly but in a secure monitored environment where no old person need have the concerns of being robbed etc.
The growth of these should be encouraged and the Indian attitude toward aging must change. How can we just look away from these core issues that you and I will be facing one day and say we will not treat our DIL the way our MIL treats us? These will just be empty words. We have to face the truth a MIL will be a MIL so will you and I be one day. So what can we do to see that our kid sdo not have to face the stress that you and I are facing?
Why are we so afraid of facing the truth about aging?
Reply to Original MessageReply to Original Message   Reply to Original Message Reply to This Message   Msg Objection   Go to Top
 

2007-04-04
#3
Anonymous Name: vimpi
Subject:  Indian marriages



Often in India marriages are not just between two individuals rather between two families.
From what i have observed in abusive Indian marriages it is the extended family like MILS, SILS, BILS who intefere and cause so many problems for the couple. Finally the husbands self esteem is affected because he is not able keep his mom, sister, brother and his wife happy. So he begins to attempt to control his wife by striking her abusing her because he believes he lived in harmony with his mom sis and brother , father etc before this woman called wife came along. His family encourages him to believe that his wife is the root cause and that he as man should be able to control her and make her change.
Most often all the wife wants is for the husband to accept that now he married her his topmost priority should be the welfare of wife and kids.
It is this expectation that is not met and the whole cycle of abuse and fights begins.
The system is flawed in more ways than one. The most basic flaw as I have been repeatedly pointing out is that parents expect to live with their sons. This is why the male child is preferred over the female child in India. This is the root cause of so many evils in Indian society. If this tradition which is losing validity changes a lot of social problems in Indian society could be reduced.
Reply to Original MessageReply to Original Message   Reply to Original Message Reply to This Message   Msg Objection   Go to Top

 
2007-04-05
#4
Anonymous Name: sivakamia
Subject:  Hurt people hurt people



I think Vimpi and Sudha, though you indicate two important regrets and biases we commonly have, both men and women (boy-child and living with the man´ s family of origin), I see it stemming from one psychological process.

Many mother-in-law´ s have said that when they were younger and facing issues with their MIL´ s, they decided that she would be very very nice with her D-I-L. But they are the ones who are quite dissatisfied with status-quo after their sin´ s marriage. When I speak to their DIL´ s I hear a repetition of events- the transgenerational abuse that both of you mentioned.

SO, deciding and identifying the bias is not enough. It´ s not also just enough to " I´ m not going to be this way when I become a MIL" . When we face issues that turn into regrets tomorrow, this easily translates into feeling " victimized" by the system and hence somehow justifying our abuse to the less powerful in the home- the DIL. Of course no MIL would say abuse is what she is doing. Instead she is very likely to say " Everyone´ s unfair to me" .

(Except of course those that are really sick who feel genuinely " happy" through sadistic pleasure of abusing. This is actually rarer.)

But my point is, people who are hurt today who don´ t resolve their issues with age, carry that hurt which gets precipitated as hurt directed to other people- those with less power, namely DIL´ s, children etc.

I think the change does start with us. The system might help and we could influence some change. But that´ s a long time coming. The key is: would I be able to resolve issues to at least a decent extent and develop some self-esteem, so that when I am old, the hurt does not get carried over to the next generation? or translate into expecting ineffective ways of dealing with my insecurities- for ex. by expecting one´ s grown up child to compensate for my inadequacies- say, live only my son´ s home with little to no readiness to emotionally adjust to his sharing of time and emotions and energy between his mother and his wife & kids.

The more I work with women and from my own life experience, I think we should be careful in monitoring hurt we carry- I mean WE- because we are more marginalized and invisibilized and we naturally carry more burden.
Msg Objection   Go to Top

 
2007-04-05
#5
Anonymous Name: sudha
Subject:  old age!



true, many of us here are suffering because of this faulty tradition. but how many of us pledge to ourselves not to behave like our ILs and not depend on our sons. Even in this generation where women are supposedly financially independent, boys are preferred over girls. Why is it so ? I delivered in a big hospital and I could see the difference in people´ s behaviour when they have a boy child. the way they are joyful, the way they distribute sweets to everybody in the hospital, u can still make out that the preference of boys is still very much prevalent.
And many of them in old age though financially independant are still very much dependant on the sons as it is more safe and secure to stay with them. In India, not many old people prefer to stay alone for security reasons. They have so many reasons from their perspective that what if they die suddenly, what if somebody robs them, how do they trust the maid etc. but of course, the girls parents have to stay alone though they too have the same reasons to fear in old age. Unlike the west, where the old do not mind staying in old age homes, in India old age homes are still thought to be only for the destitutes.
Tough to change this. Will parents of boys allow this faulty tradition to change ? Though I would like to be positive that it will change, my practical mind doubts if it is possible.
Msg Objection   Go to Top

 
2007-04-04
#6
Anonymous Name: vimpi
Subject:  Why should the flaw not be corrected?



Sudha and everyone else who reads this board,

Why do you believe that the tradition of " Parents must live with sons" will never change?
We are parents of sons and daughters now. We are suffering on account of this tradition. Why should we pass this tradition on to our kids when we know how much we suffered on account of it? Why should we depend on our kids for our security in old age?
In our moms generation most often women were not financially independant. In our generation that tradition changed we women are financially independant. So why should we pass on this faulty tradition of depending on sons to our kids? why can we not break that tradition?
Msg Objection   Go to Top

 
2007-04-04
#7
Anonymous Name: sudha
Subject:  well said !



well said vimpi!
it´ s true that the basic flaw is that the parents of boys should stay with him and hence boys are preferred over girls. But i doubt if this can be changed as parents of boys would never allow this convenience to go away from the society.
Msg Objection   Go to Top
 

2007-04-04
#8
Anonymous Name: sudha
Subject:  marriages!



in my opinion, marriage in indian society is just for convenience. The man gets a free maid to attend to his needs and the woman needs the financial security that she gets in marriage. The man over a period of time thinks that this woman is a useless person as she is just a waste of money for him, more so if she does not work and earn good money for him. He never believes her when she is ill treated or abused by her in-laws. Woman just puts up with the marriage for financial reasons as she cannot live alone. Moreover, there are the kids who mean more responsibilities and she cannot shoulder them alone. So in this case, marriage is nothing but an arrangement to live life conveniently and love or affection is never the basis. I am not blaming men or women here. But this is how the arrangement of marriage is. So where is the question of working on improving marriage when the basis itself is not love or affection ?
Reply to Original MessageReply to Original Message   Reply to Original Message Reply to This Message   Msg Objection   Go to Top

 
2007-04-04
#9
Anonymous Name: Sivakami
Subject:  EVERYONE deserves good mental health



Sudha,
I think you point out an important flaw in our system. It certainly is not set up on love and affection. It is based on our assumptions of security and responsibilities as you say, and this, when taken to the neglect of important fundamental rights such as the woman´ s self-esteem, respect and value attached to her contribution/role (household work and parenting are always undervalued), has failed innumerable of us.

A large part of my work has been with abused women and the isolation and disbelief (from the family and community) that as you say, is cruelly most common. These women´ s focus is not to " improve their marriage" but to process the grief & trauma (how the system and so-called near/dear ones let them down) so that they can " improve the quality of their own lives" . No matter how victimized a woman feels, she has the right to work on her improving her self-esteem and mental health condition. And that is my point.

For any two women, the goal may not mean the same. For Lakshmi, it may mean " my husband and i will fight less so that our children feel happier at home" for Shanti, it may mean " I have to leave my husband who has been physically and sexually traumatizing me before something awfully irreversible happens to my kids or me- so I need to figure out what I can do now and in the next months"

I agree, Sudha, there is no ultimate goal such as " work on your marriage" . It´ s about
- finding if the marriage is worth working on for every individual´ s context
- what would i lose, what would i gain?
- what does each decision mean to me?
- am i staying at the cost of my own safety, safety of my children?
- what options do i have realistically?

On any given day, we need to evaluate our mental health and circumstances. Our circumstances may be too difficult to change, but it´ s never impossible to make a dent in your emotional well-being. What gives me the guts to say this? The strength and resilience I see in the most traumatized of my clients.

Thank you Sudha. I am very glad you pointed out to the specificity of " working on your marriage" and how this does not and should not carry a universal priority for all women.
Msg Objection   Go to Top

All tips on Relationships
You ever wanted in one place.
No need to go anywhere else.
& Answers to Topic :
Here´ s to " Happy Marriage" !


Subscribe to this conversation! All tips on Relationships
You ever wanted in one place.
No need to go anywhere else.
& Answers to Topic :
Here´ s to " Happy Marriage" !


Subscribe to this conversation! All tips on Relationships
You ever wanted in one place.
No need to go anywhere else.
& Answers to Topic :
Here´ s to " Happy Marriage" !

Thanks for subscribing
You are already a member, please login to subscribe

------ OR ------

Expecting Parents
Parents of Babies
Last 7 Posts of this Board
RE:is it a good idea
There is no harm to make life exciting. There should be some spices. I have done threesomes with three couples and they are enjoying with more fun. So you should try it. My tg- hp2609. You can reach me... - Striker [View Message]
RE:Santhoshi mata's vrat.
Can I skip Santoshi mata fast for once this Friday? As its impossible in every condition to keep the fast as i am going to a remote place where such things can't be maintained? I've done more than 16 fasts with my pure heart. Will God forgive me if I skip this fast? Please reply fast. Its very urgent.... - Avika [View Message]
RE:Genuine Question
well priya its only natural to feel this attraction and lonliness. nothing wrong in it , only thing if any affair has to happen it will happen , if not , it will never happen. ... - rahul [View Message]
RE:RE:female or male sex capsules or some other assesori
I don't think would work. It would make one have garlic breath which could be a turnoff. I strongly feel that this is the time in their life to put down Kama sutra and take up some Yoga Sutra and religious books. Maybe she becomes like him too. More spiritual.... - Kim [View Message]
RE:RE:female or male sex capsules or some other assesori
Sm prolem here..what shoud i do..my huby dont listen anything... - Bindu [View Message]
RE:RE:female or male sex capsules or some other assesori
It really works??... - Divya [View Message]
RE:RE:female or male sex capsules or some other assesori
I am agree with u... - Ria [View Message]