Counselling for the child takes a cognitive approach whereby their
positive experiences of the access parent are used to challenge their negative
beliefs. The approach presented as most therapeutic for the custodial parent
is considered to be structural. They require a clearly defined access regime
with sanctions for non-compliance from the courts. Sanctions can range
anywhere from monetary fines to change of custody to supervised access
for the alienating parent.
Coping with such a situation, in which your children are alienated from you, is probably one of the most painful experiences you will have to endure. It is very difficult to reverse this process, and counselling for your children is a must.
Dr. Richard Gardner, psychiatrist, first described parental alienation
syndrome in 1985 to explain behaviour in children of separated parents,
who rejected the other parent, due to brainwashing by the custodial parent.
Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) is a diagnosis of the child who exhibits
behaviour due to parental alienation, where such behaviour further disrupts
the relationship with the access parent. Parental Alienation refers to
the alienating behaviour of the custodial parent specifically.
PA and PAS are destructive to the social-familial development of children.
It is manipulative and represents a form of psychological abuse. The goal
of parental alienation is to restrict or eliminate the role of the access
parent in the life of the child. The motivation of the custodial parent
may be anything from vengeance to financial gain.
A defining variable of PAS and PA is a custodial parent who feigns interest
in the child's access to the non-custodial parent, but where serious concerns
undermine successful access. Serious concerns range from allegations of
moral deficiencies to substandard parenting to abusive behaviour. The serious
concerns have no actual basis in fact or are gross exaggerations of minor
parental differences. There is no bona-fide evidence of actual abuse. The
upset, anger or depression felt and displayed by the alienated parent is
then used against them to support the position of the alienating parent.
Alienating parents are fully convincing of the righteousness of their
position particularly on the basis of a one-sided account of issues. This
elicits support from friends, lawyers and doctors who may be induced into
crusading the custodial parent's cause thus reinforcing and perpetuating
the alienating behaviour.
Friends, lawyers and doctors are cautioned against necessarily accepting
the position of any parent on the basis of a one-sided argument during
a custody or access dispute unless there is clear third party support for
claims of untoward behaviour by the access parent. This is not the same
as suggesting that parent's unsupported claims and concerns be rejected.
Rather, people are advised to take a neutral position and demonstrate concern
for the well-being of the children until there has been an assessment from
an assessor familiar with these issues.
In extreme cases of PAS or PA, the alienating parents may not be agreeable
to changing their behaviour on the basis of information, feedback or confrontation.
Gardner suggests some alienating parents will require strict court orders
to assure access with sanctions for lack of follow-through.
With regard to the child, time well spent in the company of the access
parent provides opportunity for learning and experiences that contradicts
any supposed concern with the access parent. In the event a child still
has difficulty adjusting, counselling may be in order for the access parent
and child.
Counselling for the parent that is being alienated, is a must. It helps
thicken the parent's skin against the rejection of the child. It also helps
them understand their child's loyalty bind with the alienating parent.
What can the alienated parent do
If continued, children subject to PA may lose the opportunity for healthy
parental relationships, the foundation of future social and familial interpersonal
relationships. Understanding, identifying and intervening as necessary
can mitigate problems in the child. Interventions may require intrusive
and forthright court action.